All right, that may seem like an odd title for my blog, but bear with me. It comes from the Kitab-i-Iqan, paragraph 239. He says, "...how grievous hath been the faithlessness and arrogance of the spiritually destitute in the face of that sanctified Beauty."
"Spiritually destitute"? What the beejeebies does that mean?
When I try to consider something that puzzling, I usually go for a brisk walk. Helps clear the cobwebs out of my musty old brain. And so that's what I did with this one.
Now, from here I could put all my thoughts in a nice neat order, typing them in such a way that it looks like a solid argument worthy of a university term paper.
But I won't.
Instead, I think I'll subject you to the way my train of thought ran with this quote.
* * * * *"Destitute" means "completely lacking". I only know that because I looked it up on my phone as I was walking. I mean, I thought that was what it meant, but I just wanted to make sure
So, they obviously had some spiritual qualities when they were born, for we were "created noble", but they did something that left them destitute.
Now, I know He's talking about those that are learned, "the divines of the age" from paragraph 238, "who have turned away from the Beauty of God". They're "clinging to their own learning", unwilling to consider anything different. He says that they're faithless, so I'll just take His word on that. But He also say they're arrogant. That's something I can grasp onto.
I know from previous sections in the Iqan that the underlying issue is a spiritual one, not an intellectual one . So arrogance is likely a symptom of this "spiritual disease", a term from paragraph 236. And one sign of this disease is "clinging to a verse", despite others that give a different view.
Ok. So clinging to a single verse out of context is not good. Got it.
They're also arrogant. Baha'u'llah isn't slamming knowledge. Not at all. What He does condemn, though, regularly throughout this book, is believing that our knowledge is somehow the final say on an issue. He tells us right at the beginning, paragraph 2, to "cease to regard the words and deeds of mortal men as a standard" for recognizing truth. That would include ourselves, too. In other words, always be open to the possibility that we're wrong, or at least that we can learn more and grow in our understanding.
Arrogance is kind of the opposite of that.
Given all that, how do they lose their spirituality? How do they go from having it, to being "destitute"? Somehow it flowed away from them. Oh, flowed!
That's an interesting image. We often speak of spirituality as something we "receive" or "drink" or "draw near to". Baha'u'llah Himself has already spoken of rivers, oceans, and the Kawthar of divine Presence.
If we think of spirituality like water, then it flows downhill. So when we are arrogant, it flows away from us. This is one of the reasons humility is so important.
Oh, and in the Iqan, Baha'u'llah demonstrates this humility. After all, He hadn't declared His mission yet, so the uncle had no reason to regard His words as infallible. At least, not when the book was written. Interesting.
Maybe that's why He regularly encourages the reader to check out the old stories for themselves. He's telling us not to take His word for it. Paragraph 3 (yes, I've read this book a lot in the past few years), He says, "Refer ye, to verify this truth, to that which hath been recorded in every sacred Book." And He does this a lot in the Iqan.
He is demonstrating that humility which is so important.
But these arrogant leaders are not. In fact, they're doing just the opposite. Paragraph 237, where He says that if the Manifestation reveals "that which is the least contrary to their desire, they bitterly oppose Him". Not the most contrary, but the least. So it's not about the intellectual argument. It's about anything that goes against what they say. That's the height of egotism.
And maybe that's also why He says that Socrates "was indeed wise, accomplished and righteous", and praises him as "the most distinguished of all philosophers and was highly versed in wisdom." Socrates' whole thing was that he recognized what he didn't know. He was, in that regard, the epitome of humility.
So here, in this section of the Iqan, where Baha'u'llah is using the verses from the Qur'an to guide the uncle to turn to the Writings of the Bab and see if they're from God, He is essentially telling the uncle to beware of this danger. Don't think that you know it all. Don't presume that what you believe is the final say on something.
That is a spiritual quality, not an intellectual one.
And maybe that's why these divines are being recognized as "spiritually destitute".
